Archive for the ‘Wind’ Category

Environmental Groups can do more Harm than Good. Help US Wind Farms.

June 25th, 2010

Image from capewind.org

Image from capewind.org

The Cape Wind project in Nantucket Sound, off the coast of Massachusetts, has been stuck fighting to exist for the last 9 years.  Residents that didn’t want turbines in their back yard (NiMBYs) have been engaging every group that may have any legal grounds to halt the project involved, using various tactics like new claims of tribal ground that were not granted.  The most recent lawsuit, brought by PEER (Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility), claims that the environmental impact studies did not pay enough attention to birds and their migration habits.

The Mass Audubon Society, one of the most prominent organizations that focuses on Massachusetts environmental issues, initially felt that the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was lacking and did its own study.  Their own independent study found that the environmental risks of not moving forward with the wind farm far outweighed the environmental impact of going ahead.  Rising sea levels from CO2 emissions would do more damage to local beaches, putting bird species more at risk because of destroyed nesting grounds.

I believe PEER is acting more in the interests of previous project opponents than it is the environment.  The DEIS came out 4 years ago, and the project has been going on for 9.  More than enough time has passed to do a meaningful impact study, and they are speaking up only after the project was approved.  Some quotes include:

“As a result of these failures, there is no reliable information on how many birds will perish in the huge turbine blades despite requirements that the best scientific information must be used”

To paraphrase Saul Griffith, previously involved with Makani Power, the number one killer of birds in the United States is Chicken Farming.  The danger to birds from wind turbines pale in comparison.  Any death at all is tragedy, but inaction will lead to more death.

The delays have gone on for too long, and failure to implement the first major off shore wind project in the US could have dire consequences for the environment and sustainable energy initiatives.  You should contact PEER to let them know what you think, and ask them to drop the lawsuit.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon

Concept Wind, Solar and Hydrogen Plant Announced

July 16th, 2009

My recent post about Hydrogen was not too far off. Jetstream Wind, Inc. in New Mexico has announced plans for using wind and solar to produce energy, and use the excess to produce Hydrogen. In this case they are not selling the excess, but burning it to spin turbines when extra is needed.

This plant doesn’t address the issue of long distance transmission, as all power will stay local, but the concept is sound and is a good way to reduce the output variability of wind and solar.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon

Hydrogen is Our Friend, But Still Not Practical For Cars

July 7th, 2009

One somewhat common misconception is that hydrogen is an energy source.  It’s not a source, it’s just a way to store energy.  In the recent climate bill, I was glad to hear no mention of the “hydrogen economy” as if it were going to replace petroleum based fuels.  In addition to the myriad of problems with using hydrogen for cars, like infrastructure, it still takes a lot of energy to product hydrogen.  Two frequently used methods for producing hydrogen gas are electrolysis, which is very energy intensive, and stripping it from hydrocarbons, which is arguably as dirty as current fuels.

The reason this concept is important is that renewable energy sources, like solar and wind are not as predictable as traditional power plants.  Traditional power plants can increase production if more energy is needed, or decrease it when it’s not.  However, we can’t make the wind blow harder or the sun shine brighter when we need more power.  When they produce too much power, excess will go to waste unless it is either dumped, sent to another grid, or captured.

Sending power to another grid is in many cases wasteful because a lot is lost in transmission.  Keeping the power local is ultimately more efficient.  There are a lot of methods for capturing energy, like using it to pump water into a reservoir and using hydro power when more is needed, batteries, or making hydrogen.  Hydro power and batteries can be used locally, but still have a problem transmitting over long distances.  Hydrogen is a good solution in this case because it can be sent over long distances relatively efficiently.

Hydrogen can be shipped, potentially in hydrogen powered vehicles, or it can be piped.  These may be viable options as the US transitions to a more robust national grid.  There are many places in the US where wind is abundant, but are far from population centers, like in the plains.

US Wind Map

As the map shows, off shore is the best place for wind turbines, but unfortunately it’s extremely expensive to build off shore.  It will likely be the most cost effective to build the wind turbines on land, then send the power to other parts of the country.  The technology is available, now we just need to build it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon