Archive for the ‘Electrical Grid’ Category

Environmental Groups can do more Harm than Good. Help US Wind Farms.

June 25th, 2010

Image from capewind.org

Image from capewind.org

The Cape Wind project in Nantucket Sound, off the coast of Massachusetts, has been stuck fighting to exist for the last 9 years.  Residents that didn’t want turbines in their back yard (NiMBYs) have been engaging every group that may have any legal grounds to halt the project involved, using various tactics like new claims of tribal ground that were not granted.  The most recent lawsuit, brought by PEER (Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility), claims that the environmental impact studies did not pay enough attention to birds and their migration habits.

The Mass Audubon Society, one of the most prominent organizations that focuses on Massachusetts environmental issues, initially felt that the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was lacking and did its own study.  Their own independent study found that the environmental risks of not moving forward with the wind farm far outweighed the environmental impact of going ahead.  Rising sea levels from CO2 emissions would do more damage to local beaches, putting bird species more at risk because of destroyed nesting grounds.

I believe PEER is acting more in the interests of previous project opponents than it is the environment.  The DEIS came out 4 years ago, and the project has been going on for 9.  More than enough time has passed to do a meaningful impact study, and they are speaking up only after the project was approved.  Some quotes include:

“As a result of these failures, there is no reliable information on how many birds will perish in the huge turbine blades despite requirements that the best scientific information must be used”

To paraphrase Saul Griffith, previously involved with Makani Power, the number one killer of birds in the United States is Chicken Farming.  The danger to birds from wind turbines pale in comparison.  Any death at all is tragedy, but inaction will lead to more death.

The delays have gone on for too long, and failure to implement the first major off shore wind project in the US could have dire consequences for the environment and sustainable energy initiatives.  You should contact PEER to let them know what you think, and ask them to drop the lawsuit.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon

CCS: Investing in Transitional Technology is not the Same as Compromising

January 10th, 2010

I will first state for the record that I believe there is no such thing as clean coal.  I would be incredibly happy if there were no new coal fired powered plants ever built.  Even if I believed it were true, which I don’t, I would still believe that investing in Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) is worthwhile.  In an ideal world, not only would no new coal fired power plants be built, existing plants would be shut down.

However, we do not live in an ideal world, and we need to do something productive until we get there.  There are still many problems with CCS, including expense and lack of storage locations large enough.  Despite the fact that renewable technologies are the best choice for new development, it will be a very long time until there will be enough production or the necessary infrastructure changes will be in place to support it.  There are so many hurdles to wide scale renewable adoption, it would be in our best interest to invest in parallel efforts to reduce the impact of current technologies, even if only temporary.

The belief of many is that coal fired power plants will continue to be a widely used energy source until the renewable alternatives are cheaper per kilowatt hour overall.  My personal belief is that it will take decades for renewable energy to be cheaper than coal on its own.  However, subsidy of renewable energy technologies, coupled with legislation requiring coal companies cover the external costs to society of burning coal, then there may be cost parity sooner.  Even if production became cheaper than coal tomorrow, the necessary changes to the grid would take years to implement, not to mention the time it would take to build the generation capacity necessary to meet current demand.

Coal has so many problems, but the sad fact is that we are stuck with it for the foreseeable future.  While CCS is only a transition technology, embracing its development is not the same thing as abandoning the belief that coal is extremely bad.  Some may say that adoption of CCS may lead to the use of coal for longer, but that’s a separate discussion.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon

Re-post: How Will the Smart Grid Work?

September 25th, 2009

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=smart-grid-nist-standards-commerce-department

The Commerce Department has started releasing smart grid standards, but we’re still waiting for the NIST and FERC to weigh in.  They both see the importance of changes to the grid, and final comments are expected by the end of the year.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon

Bacteria May Help Nuclear Waste Cleanup

September 10th, 2009

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/09/090908193444.htm

“The bacteria Wall is studying are bio-corrosives and can change the solubility of heavy metals. They can take uranium and convert it to uraninite, a nearly insoluble substance that will sink to the bottom of a lake or stream. Wall is looking into the bacteria’s water cleansing ability and how long the changed material would remain inert.”

If this becomes feasible on a large scale, nuclear waste cleanup may have just gotten easier.  It will be a huge step in reducing some of the drawbacks of nuclear power.  With fewer drawbacks, there should also be fewer objections, and it will become a more viable option for replacing coal as the main source of power in the US.  While this will not eliminate it completely, the bacterial processed described in the article could drastically reduce the radioactivity in an environment that either stores or is affected by nuclear waste.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon

Video: CFL Lightbulbs in Plain English

August 16th, 2009

A good (but cheesy) video on Compact Fluorescent bulbs.

Via: CommonCraft.com

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon

Consumer Education is Critical to the Success of the Smart Grid

July 17th, 2009

DOE Smart Grid Illustration
There are a lot of articles about the smart grid, smart appliances, connectivity with electric cars, and the systems necessary to use energy as efficiently as possible.  In order for these technologies to be effective, changes in consumer behavior will also be necessary.  Without educating the consumers on how sthe smart appliances help save energy, there will not be much benefit over traditional energy efficient appliances.

What makes an appliance “smart” is that it can takes queues from the grid to power up during off peak hours.  Using electricity at off peak hours when electricity is cheap will not only save the consumer money, but it is also cleaner.  Many people that already know how the appliances work do not truly understand why they are cleaner.  The reason off peak power is cleaner is that most power plants typically run at all hours at “base load.”  At night, these plants can easily keep up with demand, and can scale back production if power is not used.  Most of the plants that run at all hours use newer technology, both because of Clean Air Act emissions requirements and the newer technologies are more efficient.  Efficiency gains are not just good for environmental reasons, plants can produce more with less fuel, so they are cheaper.

During peak hours, demand for power is greater than the newer and cleaner plants can handle, so older coal fired power plants need to be brought online to add capacity.  Because the technology is older, emissions are dirtier and production is less efficient, which means added cost to the consumer.  By deferring power use to off peak times, consumers save money and reduce the need for dirtier power production.

Education is key to the success of the smart grid because consumer behavior will need to change.  Everyday actions like doing the  laundry will need to change.  For practical reasons, when people do laundry they typically put it in the dryer immediately after the washer.  The clothes can get moldy if left in the washer without drying, and the next load also needs to go in.  For tasks like laundry that require interaction, practicality may get in the way of deferring power usage.  To get over these hurdles, purchasing behavior must also change, which will only happen with education.

If consumers purchase combination washer and dryers, rather than standalone, they can drop laundry in at night and it will be cleaned and dry by the morning.  Doing laundry this way would even be more convenient because one wouldn’t have to wait for the wash to complete to start drying, or move wet clothes from one machine to another.  If throughput is more of a factor than cost, two can be used in the same space as traditional separate appliances.

What usually matters to people is that tasks like laundry get done, and in the easiest way possible.  Smart grid appliances that are inconvenient for people will generally not have success in the market.  In order to have both success in the market, and truly be “smart appliances” consumers will need to know how to use them properly.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon

Concept Wind, Solar and Hydrogen Plant Announced

July 16th, 2009

My recent post about Hydrogen was not too far off. Jetstream Wind, Inc. in New Mexico has announced plans for using wind and solar to produce energy, and use the excess to produce Hydrogen. In this case they are not selling the excess, but burning it to spin turbines when extra is needed.

This plant doesn’t address the issue of long distance transmission, as all power will stay local, but the concept is sound and is a good way to reduce the output variability of wind and solar.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon

Hydrogen is Our Friend, But Still Not Practical For Cars

July 7th, 2009

One somewhat common misconception is that hydrogen is an energy source.  It’s not a source, it’s just a way to store energy.  In the recent climate bill, I was glad to hear no mention of the “hydrogen economy” as if it were going to replace petroleum based fuels.  In addition to the myriad of problems with using hydrogen for cars, like infrastructure, it still takes a lot of energy to product hydrogen.  Two frequently used methods for producing hydrogen gas are electrolysis, which is very energy intensive, and stripping it from hydrocarbons, which is arguably as dirty as current fuels.

The reason this concept is important is that renewable energy sources, like solar and wind are not as predictable as traditional power plants.  Traditional power plants can increase production if more energy is needed, or decrease it when it’s not.  However, we can’t make the wind blow harder or the sun shine brighter when we need more power.  When they produce too much power, excess will go to waste unless it is either dumped, sent to another grid, or captured.

Sending power to another grid is in many cases wasteful because a lot is lost in transmission.  Keeping the power local is ultimately more efficient.  There are a lot of methods for capturing energy, like using it to pump water into a reservoir and using hydro power when more is needed, batteries, or making hydrogen.  Hydro power and batteries can be used locally, but still have a problem transmitting over long distances.  Hydrogen is a good solution in this case because it can be sent over long distances relatively efficiently.

Hydrogen can be shipped, potentially in hydrogen powered vehicles, or it can be piped.  These may be viable options as the US transitions to a more robust national grid.  There are many places in the US where wind is abundant, but are far from population centers, like in the plains.

US Wind Map

As the map shows, off shore is the best place for wind turbines, but unfortunately it’s extremely expensive to build off shore.  It will likely be the most cost effective to build the wind turbines on land, then send the power to other parts of the country.  The technology is available, now we just need to build it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon