Lost Coal Jobs Mean Lives Saved, Congratulate the Unemployed for Saving Lives

July 23, 2009 by brett Leave a reply »

In a recent House session, Representative Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) expressed her objections to the the Waxman-Markey American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (Climate Bill).   Her main objection is that by 2020, Wyoming would lose up to “15,000 high paying jobs” that can’t be replaced by green energy jobs if the bill were passed, as the nation moves away from coal fired power plants.  That’s an average of about 1500 jobs a year lost, and she apparently believes that the jobs in her district are more important than the health and lives of the rest of the country.

If the bill passes, Wyoming jobs would be particularly hit hard because there are a disproportionately large number of jobs dependent upon coal.  Coal mines in the Powder River Basin in Wyoming and Montana produce more coal than any other area of the country, even the entire Appalachian region. Compared to the rest of the country, Wyoming does not have to burn as much coal because it is not a population center, and that means health effects from emissions are disproportionately low.

In the rest of the country from power plant emissions *every year*, there are more than 23,000 deaths, 21,000 hospital admissions, 26,000 emergency room visits for asthma, 38,000 heart attacks, 16,000 cases of chronic bronchitis, 554,000 asthma attacks, and 3,186,000 lost work days (Source: Harvard Environmental Management, pdf p23).

I have not heard Rep. Lummis speak about responsibility, but I did hear Steven Leer, Chairman and CEO of Arch Coal speak about their mining operations in the Powder River Basin. It was clear that the people that mine coal, but do not burn it, completely abdicate themselves of any responsibility for coal fired power plant emissions.  We cannot let the deliberate distortion of the truth and intentional omissions continue to cause problems for the rest of us.

Rep. Lummis wants you to feel bad for the 1500+ workers and their families that will lose their jobs each year because of the Climate bill.  Apparently, she does not want you to feel bad for the 23,000+ people that die every year, or their families, because she feels it’s not the mining that’s responsible.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon

2 Responses

  1. Zoran says:

    Hi there,
    Amazing! Not clear for me, how offen you updating your econuz.com.
    Thank you
    Zoran

  2. brett says:

    I’ve got a day job and am enrolled in a Master’s program for Environmental Management, so I try to find the time to post at least once a day.

Leave a Reply